
Three SME profiles, three outcomes. Dialpad Pro at ~£20/user/mo on the left; split stack and full-switch options on the right.
| Profile | Dialpad today | Split stack | Full switch to 3CX |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 users, 8 sales | Dialpad£500 / mo | £296 / moDialpad for 8 sales (£160) + 3CX for 17 office (£136). Saves £204/mo. | 3CX£200 / moSaves £300/mo if AI features unused. |
| 50 users, 15 sales | Dialpad£1,000 / mo | £580 / moDialpad for 15 + 3CX for 35. Saves £420/mo = £5,040/yr. | 3CX£400 / moSaves £7,200/yr. |
| 100 users, 25 sales | Dialpad£2,000 / mo | £1,100 / moDialpad for 25 + 3CX for 75. Saves £10,800/yr. | 3CX£800 / moSaves £14,400/yr. |
The technical setup is straightforward:
Net effect: sales team experience is unchanged; everyone else pays £8/user instead of £20/user; the firm's bill drops 50–60%.
Easier than full switch because Dialpad keeps running through implementation.
3CX has its own CRM integrations with HubSpot, Salesforce, Dynamics, Zoho, Pipedrive — click-to-call, screen-pop, call logging. Less AI-flavoured than Dialpad's integration but covers the basics. For sales pod users staying on Dialpad in a split stack, their existing integration is untouched.
Free. We'll model both options against your actual numbers (current Dialpad bill, AI usage estimate, growth plan) and tell you which path saves the most without breaking the sales team's tools.
Yes if you stay on Dialpad (full or split). If you full-switch, 3CX's mobile app replaces it. The conceptual model is similar; users adapt in a few days.